Response to Commentaries on ‘Ethical and Technical Challenges in Compensating for Harm Due to Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering’

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (1):103-105 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We thank the commentators for their interesting and helpful feedback on our previously published target article (Svoboda and Irvine, 2014). One of our objectives in that article was to identify areas of uncertainty that would need to be addressed in crafting a just SRM compensation system. The commentators have indicated some possible ways of reducing such uncertainty. Although we cannot respond to all their points due to limitations of space, we wish to address here the more pressing criticisms the commentators have offered.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Solar Geoengineering: Reassessing Costs, Benefits, and Compensation.Joshua Horton - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (2):175-177.
Response to Svoboda and Irvine.Jesse Reynolds - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (2):183-185.
A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy.David R. Morrow - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5):618-640.
Geoengineering.Augustine Pamplany & Bert Gordijn - 2023 - In Nathanaël Wallenhorst & Christoph Wulf (eds.), Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer. pp. 257-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-24

Downloads
494 (#57,937)

6 months
111 (#52,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Toby Svoboda
Colgate University

Citations of this work

Add more citations