- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The moral skeptic
New York: Oxford University Press (2009)
Abstract
Introduction -- The self-interest based contractarian response to the skeptic -- A feminist ethics response to the skeptic -- Deformed desires -- Self-interest versus morality -- The amoralist -- The motive skeptic -- The interdependency thesis.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Anita M. Superson's The Moral Skeptic. [REVIEW]Jussi Suikkanen - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Justifying Moral Principles: Responding to the Radical Moral Skeptic.Clarence Alfred Bonnen - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Feminist Ethics: Defeating the Why-Be-Moral Skeptic.Anita M. Superson - 1998 - Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (2):59-86.
Is Hume a moral skeptic?James Fieser - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1):89-105.
Superson, Anita M. The Moral Skeptic . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 . Pp. 250. $24.95 (paper).Neera K. Badhwar - 2010 - Ethics 120 (3):635-639.
The self-interest based contractarian response to the why-be-moral skeptic.Anita M. Superson - 1990 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):427-447.
Reply to Russell Jacobs’ “World Hunger and Self-Sacrifice: Response on Behalf of the Skeptic”.Thomas Peard - 2007 - Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):215-219.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
64 (#331,207)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
2009-01-28
Downloads
64 (#331,207)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Strategies for Making Feminist Philosophy Mainstream Philosophy.Anita Superson - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (2):410-418.
The Morality of Resisting Oppression.Rebecca Hannah Smith - 2020 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 6 (4).
Fool Me Once, Shame on You, Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me: The Alleged Prisoner’s Dilemma in Hobbes’s Social Contract.Necip Fikri Alican - 2019 - Dialogue and Universalism 29 (1):183-204.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54ff658c48-svzvt uwo