Epicurus on Death

Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):185-203 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I try to state and defend Epicurus' argument that death is nothing to us. I discuss some of the most prominent objections that have been raised against Epicurus' position in the recent literature; the authors whose work I discuss include T. Nagel, B.Williams, H. S. Silverstein, and D. Furley. I argue that all of these author's criticisms are flawed in one way or another While this result does not suffice to prove Epicurus right, it does show that Epicurus' insight is much deeper than many of his critics have suspected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epicurus on Death.Leopold Stubenberg - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):185-203.
Nietzsche on Epicurus and Death.Keith Ansell-Pearson & Rebecca Bamford - 2020 - In Keith Ansell-Pearson & Rebecca Bamford (eds.), Nietzsche’s Dawn: Philosophy, Ethics, and the Passion of Knowledge. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 187–204.
Epicurus : freedom, death, and hedonism.Phillip Mitsis - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 73.
Epicurus on Death and the Duration of Life.Phillip Mitsis - 1988 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):303-322.
Epicurean equanimity towards death.Kai Draper - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):92–114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
35 (#649,724)

6 months
5 (#1,053,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leopold Stubenberg
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references