William Whewell and John Stuart Mill: Their Controversy About Scientific Knowledge

Journal of the History of Ideas 16 (1/4):209 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2707663

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the Methodology of Political Economy.Samuel Hollander - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):127.
Science rules: a historical introduction to scientific methods.Peter Achinstein (ed.) - 2004 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Laura J. Snyder, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. [REVIEW]John P. McCaskey - 2008 - The Objective Standard 2008:107–109.
History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate.Aaron D. Cobb - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
The Reception of Positivism in Whewell, Mill and Brentano.Arnaud Dewalque - 2022 - In Ion Tanasescu, Alexandru Bejinariu, Susan Krantz Gabriel & Constantin Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the Positive Philosophy of Comte and Mill: With Translations of Original Writings on Philosophy as Science by Franz Brentano. Berlin: De Gruyter.
19.yy i̇ngi̇li̇z ahlak düşüncesi̇nde önemli̇ bi̇r kalem kavgasi: William Whewell ve John Stuart mill polemi̇ği̇.Metin Aydin - forthcoming - Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi.
Essays, Philosophical and Theological.James Martineau - 1866 - Holt.
John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses.Struan Jacobs - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.
Why John Stuart mill called himself a socialist.Raimund Ottow - 1993 - History of European Ideas 17 (4):479-483.
The War on Induction: Whewell Takes On Newton and Mill (Norton Takes On Everyone).Peter Achinstein - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):728-739.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
56 (#387,876)

6 months
8 (#610,780)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
Unwarranted assumptions: Claude Bernard and the growth of the vera causa standard.Raphael Scholl - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82 (C):120-130.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references