History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William Whewell raised a series of objections concerning John Stuart Mill’s philosophy of science which suggested that Mill’s views were not properly informed by the history of science or by adequate reflection on scientific practices. The aim of this paper is to revisit and evaluate this incisive Whewellian criticism of Mill’s views by assessing Mill’s account of Michael Faraday’s discovery of electrical induction. The historical evidence demonstrates that Mill’s reconstruction is an inadequate reconstruction of this historical episode and the scientific practices Faraday employed. But a study of Faraday’s research also raises some questions about Whewell’s characterization of this discovery. Thus, this example provides an opportunity to reconsider the debate between Whewell and Mill concerning the role of the sciences in the development of an adequate philosophy of scientific methodology.Keywords: Inductivism; Experiment; Theory; Methodology; Electromagnetism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Mill's Philosophy of Science.Aaron D. Cobb - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 234–249.
Harriet Taylor Mill.Helen McCabe - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 112–125.
John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses.Struan Jacobs - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.
The Whewell-Mill debate on predictions, from Mill's point of view.Cornelis Menke - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:60-71.
The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
Whewell and mill on induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Mill's System of Logic.David Godden - 2014 - In W. J. Mander (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 44-70.
Whewell’s tidal researches: scientific practice and philosophical methodology.Steffen Ducheyne - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
Science rules: a historical introduction to scientific methods.Peter Achinstein (ed.) - 2004 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-22

Downloads
1,636 (#9,474)

6 months
179 (#21,181)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron D. Cobb
Wake Forest University

Citations of this work

Unwarranted assumptions: Claude Bernard and the growth of the vera causa standard.Raphael Scholl - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 82 (C):120-130.
Whewell on the classification of the sciences.Raphaël Sandoz - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60:48-54.
Framing the Epistemic Schism of Statistical Mechanics.Javier Anta - 2021 - Proceedings of the X Conference of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.
William Whewell’s Semantic Account of Induction.Corey Dethier - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):141-156.
Galilean argumentation and the inauthenticity of the Cigoli letter on painting vs. sculpture.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):492-508.

Add more citations