Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research

Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first five of these articles I have questioned the justice, and effectiveness, of total dependence in clinical research on willing volunteers. I have explored ways that might better and more equitably spread the burden of participating in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider this question: if consent is the barrier, must we regard consent as indispensable?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610600200206

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91.
Guinea Pig Duties: 1. The Need for Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (1):13-22.
Guinea Pig Duties: 2. The Origin of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (2):45-52.
Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
Guinea Pig Duties: 5. Coercion and Inducement into Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (1):3-9.
Guinea Pig Duties: 3. The Nature of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):84-89.
On using people merely as a means in clinical research.Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (2):76-83.
Consent in Clinical Research.Collin O'Neill - 2017 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 297-310.
What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.David Wendler - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):161-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
29 (#764,401)

6 months
8 (#549,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 23 references / Add more references