Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research

Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In these articles I have so far explored the set of duties that call upon patients to participate in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider whether they acquire a set of rights in consequence of participation, and what these rights may be.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
31 (#776,157)

6 months
8 (#432,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Well-being: its meaning, measurement, and moral importance.James Griffin - 1986 - Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press.
The patient as person.Paul Ramsey - 1970 - New Haven,: Yale University Press.
Law and medical ethics.J. K. Mason - 2002 - London: LexisNexis UK. Edited by Alexander McCall Smith & G. T. Laurie.

View all 16 references / Add more references