- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Assessment of relative importance of S + and S − after various stages of training
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (6):462-464 (1975)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Assessment of the relative importance of S+ and S− in rats, using intercurrent simultaneous and successive discriminations.David A. Stevens, J. Russell Mason & D. R. Wixon - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (4):200-202.
S. S. Stevens: The psychophysicist.Clifford T. Morgan - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (3):234-237.
Unblocking in a runway discrimination problem: The effects of a surprising shift from small reward to nonreward in S— relative to small reward throughout training.Steven J. Haggbloom - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):568-570.
Associative processes controlling the persistence of operant responding: S-S* and R-S.Roger L. Mellgren & Mark W. Olson - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (4):279-282.
The generalization of an R-S* expectancy in discrimination learning.Terry A. Root & Henry A. Cross - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (2):144-146.
A response instruction by visual-field interaction: S-R compatibility effect or?Bill Cotton, Ovid J. L. Tzeng & Curtis Hardyck - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (6):475-477.
Training intraphonemic discrimination of /r/−/l.Winifred Strange, Linda Polka & Sibylla Dittmann - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (6):419-422.
Effects of visual stimulus degradation, S-R compatibility, and foreperiod duration on choice reaction time and movement time.H. W. Frowein & A. F. Sanders - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (2):106-108.
A test for S-S associations in a conditional counting task.Richard A. Burns & Frances A. Nesbitt - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):441-444.
Negative S− contrast with minimal response requirements in S+.Stephen Werk & James H. McHose - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (1):25-27.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-22
Downloads
22 (#972,197)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
2014-01-22
Downloads
22 (#972,197)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Relative strengths of approach and avoidance tendencies in discrimination learning of rats trained under two types of reinforcement.David A. Stevens & Laurence D. Fechter - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):489.
Memory for frequency as a function of environmental context.Ed Eckert, N. Jack Kanak & Rick Stevens - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):507-510.
Determination of stimuli “neutral” with respect to generalization from horizontal-vertical stripes discrimination.David A. Stevens - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (6):564-566.
Analysis of the role of overlearning in discrimination reversal.M. R. D'Amato & Harry Jagoda - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (1):45.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo