Quinian bootstrapping or Fodorian combination? Core and constructed knowledge of number

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):149-150 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Carey (2009), humans construct new concepts by abstracting structural relations among sets of partly unspecified symbols, and then analogically mapping those symbol structures onto the target domain. Using the development of integer concepts as an example, I give reasons to doubt this account and to consider other ways in which language and symbol learning foster conceptual development

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to build a baby: A new toolkit?Diane Poulin-Dubois - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):144-145.
Beyond the Building Blocks Model.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):139-140.
The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Précis of the origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):113-124.
How to improve on Quinian bootstrapping – a response to nativist objections.Zoltan Jakab - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Perceptions of perceptual symbols.Lawrence Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):637-660.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
87 (#241,054)

6 months
12 (#296,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?