Beyond the Building Blocks Model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):139-140 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a commentary on Carey (2009) The Origin of Concepts. Carey rightly rejects the building blocks model of concept acquisition on the grounds that new primitive concepts can be learned via the process of bootstrapping. But new primitives can be learned by other acquisition processes that do not involve bootstrapping, and bootstrapping itself is not a unitary process. Nonetheless, the processes associated with bootstrapping provide important insights into conceptual change.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Beyond the Building Blocks Model.Margolis Laurence - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):139-140.
Can Bootstrapping Explain Concept Learning?Jacob Beck - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):110–121.
The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Précis of the origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):113-124.
How to improve on Quinian bootstrapping – a response to nativist objections.Zoltan Jakab - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Concept innateness, concept continuity, and bootstrapping.Susan Carey - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-06

Downloads
537 (#51,639)

6 months
132 (#38,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eric Margolis
University of British Columbia
Stephen Laurence
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Can Bootstrapping Explain Concept Learning?Jacob Beck - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):110–121.

Add more citations