A Theory of Propositions

Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (1):83-125 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I present a new theory of propositions, according to which propositions are abstract mathematical objects: well-formed formulas together with models. I distinguish the theory from a number of existing views and explain some of its advantages  chief amongst which are the following. On this view, propositions are unified and intrinsically truth-bearing. They are mind- and language-independent and they are governed by logic. The theory of propositions is ontologically innocent. It makes room for an appropriate interface with formal semantics and it does not enforce an overly fine or overly coarse level of granularity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representation and structure in the theory of propositions.Jeff Speaks - 2014 - In Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames & Jeff Speaks (eds.), New Thinking About Propositions. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
On Stalnaker’s Simple Theory of Propositions.Peter Fritz - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (1):1-31.
A Formal Theory of Propositions.John Arthur Winnie - 1970 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
An empirically-informed cognitive theory of propositions.Berit Brogaard - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5):534-557.
Whitehead's Theory of Propositions.Michael Louis Harrington - 1972 - Dissertation, Emory University
Contribution to the theory of propositions.John R. Mattingly - 1923 - Journal of Philosophy 20 (23):623-629.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-06

Downloads
68 (#310,689)

6 months
11 (#350,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas J. J. Smith
University of Sydney

References found in this work

Mathematical truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Frege on demonstratives.John Perry - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):474-497.
Index, context, and content.David K. Lewis - 1980 - In Stig Kanger & Sven Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar. Reidel. pp. 79-100.

View all 41 references / Add more references