Discourse-Ethical Gradualism

The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:95-106 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My question is the following: to what extent is ethical anthropocentrism tenable? In a “discourse ethical” perspective I will consider some case-oriented arguments in favor of a paradigmatically unique ethical standing for humans and some arguments in favor of an ethical gradualism between humans and other mammals and between humans and nature, ending with a conclusion in favor of a fair treatment of all moral subjects, human and non-human.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How is Environmental Ethics Possible?Wang Xinyan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:155-167.
The Importance of Being Human.Dan Egonsson - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 14:24-28.
Why Vegetarianism.Krishna M. Pathak - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:275-280.
Ecocentrism as anthropocentrism.Martin Drenthen - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):151 - 154.
‘Post-Structuralism’ and the Dispensation of the Good.Stephen Watson - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 8:195-210.
The Moral Inquiry into the Lack of Corporate Social Responsibility.Yuhua Yu - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:345-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
34 (#670,329)

6 months
4 (#1,263,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references