- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Moral heuristics
In John Doris, Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Altruism’s Moral Heuristics.Julian Friedland - 2021 - In Deborah C. Poff & Alex C. Michalos, Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer Verlag. pp. 83-87.
Moral heuristics and risk.Cass R. Sunstein - 2007 - In Tim Lewens, Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Sunstein Cr - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4).
Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
On moral intuitions and moral heuristics: A response.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
A selectionist approach integrates moral heuristics.Robert A. Hinde - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):555-556.
The next frontier: Moral heuristics and the treatment of animals.Harold A. Herzog & Gordon M. Burghardt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):554-555.
Moral Heuristics and Two Types of Information Processing.Vitaliy Nadurak - 2022 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 10 (2):46-62.
Moral heuristics: Rigid rules or flexible inputs in moral deliberation?Elizabeth Anderson - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):544-545.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Explaining the Abstract/Concrete Paradoxes in Moral Psychology: The NBAR Hypothesis.Eric Mandelbaum & David Ripley - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):351-368.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo