A Comment on the Animal Rights Debate

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (3):89-90 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Readers of Applied Philosophy will not be surprised to learn where I stand on the debate between Jones and Perry, on the one hand, and Loftin on the other. In their original article, Jones and Perry managed to get my views very seriously wrong on some important points. Since they had the benefit of reading my explanations of my position to others who had gotten it wrong previously, I came near to despair over my apparent inability to state things clearly enough for them to be understood by others. Then I read the reply by Loftin and my depression lifted. Loftin has put my views so clearly, and so accurately, that surely everyone can now see where Jones and Perry went wrong. There is no need for me to add anything by way of clarification.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Reason.Errol Harris - 1982 - Idealistic Studies 12 (3):199-210.
When Doctors Get It Wrong.Konrad Blair - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (2):89-92.
Reply to My Three Critics.William K. Frankena - 1980 - The Monist 63 (1):110-128.
Replies to My Critics.Kent Bach - 2013 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):217-249.
Rejoinder to "can we save science?".George A. Lundberg - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (4):341-347.
Reply to My Critics.James A. Harris - 2019 - Hume Studies 45 (1):37-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
28 (#801,164)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references