When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà‐Vilà

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):345-348 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend my reading of Hume's "Of the Standard of Taste" against objections raised by Victor Durà‐Vilà. Two points are central to my defense. One is that Hume takes the joint verdict of true judges to indicate, rather than constitute, the standard of beauty. Two is that Hume requires a joint verdict because individual verdicts need not be expressive of human nature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rule and verdict.James Shelley - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):319-320.
The Chief Business of the True Judges in Hume’s Standard of Taste.Byoungjae Kim - 2024 - British Journal of Aesthetics 64 (4):585-602.
Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges.James Shelley - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (2):145-153.
Some questions in Hume's aesthetics.Christopher Williams - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):157–169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-28

Downloads
85 (#247,109)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Shelley
Auburn University

Citations of this work

Hume’s aesthetics.Theodore Gracyk - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references