Rule and verdict

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):319-320 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend my reading of Hume's "Of the Standard of Taste" from objections raised by Jeffrey Wieand. I argue that Wieand doesn't take seriously enough Hume's claim that beauty is not a quality of objects, and that taking this claim seriously requires regarding Hume's true judges as ideal.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà‐Vilà.James Shelley - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):345-348.
Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges.James Shelley - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (2):145-153.
The Chief Business of the True Judges in Hume’s Standard of Taste.Byoungjae Kim - 2024 - British Journal of Aesthetics 64 (4):585-602.
Hume's double standard of taste.James Shelley - 1994 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):437-445.
Some questions in Hume's aesthetics.Christopher Williams - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):157–169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#272,896)

6 months
19 (#154,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Shelley
Auburn University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references