- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Who are “we”? Dealing with conflicting moral obligations
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 (2020)
Abstract
Satisfying one's obligations is an important part of being human. However, people's obligations can often prescribe contradictory behaviors. Moral obligations conflict, and so do obligations to different groups. We propose that a broader framework is needed to account for how people balance different social and moral obligations.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Differentiating between different forms of moral obligations.Rajen A. Anderson, Benjamin C. Ruisch & David A. Pizarro - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e57.
Conflicting obligations in human social life.Jacob B. Hirsh, Garriy Shteynberg & Michele J. Gelfand - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e72.
On individual and shared obligations: in defense of the activist’s perspective.Gunnar Björnsson - 2021 - In Budolfson Mark, McPherson Tristram & Plunkett David (eds.), Philosophy and Climate Change. Oxford University Press.
The joy of obligation: Human cultural worldviews can enhance the rewards of meeting obligations.Emma E. Buchtel - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e63.
The divided we and multiple obligations.Bradley Franks & Andrew Stewart - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e70.
Obligations to whom, obligations to what? A philosophical perspective on the objects of our obligations.Kati Kish Bar-On - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e58.
Making sense of collective moral obligations: A comparison of existing approaches.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2018 - In Kendy Hess, Violetta Igneski & Tracy Lynn Isaacs (eds.), Collectivity: Ontology, Ethics, and Social Justice. Nw York: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 109-132.
Overcoming Moral Minimalism.Alexander Shevchenko - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:289-292.
The moral obligations of conflict and resistance.Melanie Killen & Audun Dahl - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e75.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-01
Downloads
27 (#822,464)
6 months
7 (#699,353)
2020-05-01
Downloads
27 (#822,464)
6 months
7 (#699,353)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Alan P. Fiske - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (4):689-723.
When and Why People Evaluate Negative Reciprocity as More Fair Than Positive Reciprocity.Alex Shaw, Anam Barakzai & Boaz Keysar - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (8):e12773.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo