Book Review: John P. Burgess and Gideon Rose. A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics [Book Review]

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):600-612 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1305/ndjfl/1039118873

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

John P. Burgess and Gideon Rosen, A subject with no object. Strategies for nominalistic interpretation of mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York1997, xi + 259 pp. [REVIEW]Charles Parsons - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):391-394.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 30 (3):231-259.
Book Review: Stewart Shapiro. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. [REVIEW]John P. Burgess - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):283-291.
Review of J. P. Burgess and G. A. Rosen, A Subject With No Object. Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Michael D. Resnik - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):505–516.
Book Review: Stewart Shapiro. Foundations with foundationalism. [REVIEW]Nino B. Cocchiarella - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (3):453-468.
Review of J. P. Burgess and G. Rosen, A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.Bob Hale - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):161-167.
Book Review: Stewart Shapiro. Vagueness in Context. [REVIEW]Leon Horsten - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):221-226.
Review of Stewart Shapiro (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. [REVIEW]JC Beall - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).
A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics.John Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (198):124-126.
Book Review. Vagueness in Context. Stewart Shapiro. [REVIEW]Matti Eklund - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (5).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
103 (#216,194)

6 months
6 (#698,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Nominalist platonism.George Boolos - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.
Nominalist platonism.George Boolos - 1998 - In Richard Jeffrey, Logic, Logic, and Logic. Harvard University Press. pp. 73-87.
Ontological commitments.William P. Alston - 1958 - Philosophical Studies 9 (1-2):8 - 17.
To Be is to be a Value of a Variable.George Boolos - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):616-617.

View all 7 references / Add more references