Unbridled Right to Reproduce for Domesticated Animals—More Harm Than Good? A Reply to Siemieniec

Journal of Animal Ethics 15 (1):93-98 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Unrestricted reproductive rights for domesticated animals, including the right to roam freely, will have serious consequences for domesticated animals in today's world. While political and legal theories focus on population control to justify fertility restrictions, they do so to save animals’ lives, and one consequence of restricting domesticated animals’ reproductive rights is many more animal deaths. Further, theorists have explored whether population control methods unjustifiably infringe on animals’ rights and argue that at least some are not only justified but arguably mandated under animal rights theories. And finally, it is doubtful today that unbridled reproductive rights for domesticated animals that protect their rights to freedom of association and mobility is in their best interests.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,004

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-26

Downloads
3 (#1,881,885)

6 months
3 (#1,184,619)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?