Understanding preservation theorems: chapter VI of Proper and Improper Forcing, I

Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (1-2):171-202 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present an exposition of Section VI.1 and most of Section VI.2 from Shelah’s book Proper and Improper Forcing. These sections offer proofs of the preservation under countable support iteration of proper forcing of various properties, including proofs that ωω\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\omega^\omega}$$\end{document} -bounding, the Sacks property, the Laver property, and the P-point property are preserved by countable support iteration of proper forcing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathias forcing and ultrafilters.Janusz Pawlikowski & Wojciech Stadnicki - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (7-8):857-865.
Maximally embeddable components.Miloš S. Kurilić - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (7-8):793-808.
A forcing notion related to Hindman’s theorem.Luz María García-Ávila - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (1-2):133-159.
A null ideal for inaccessibles.Sy-David Friedman & Giorgio Laguzzi - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (5-6):691-697.
A parallel to the null ideal for inaccessible $$\lambda $$ λ : Part I.Saharon Shelah - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (3-4):319-383.
Indestructibility properties of remarkable cardinals.Yong Cheng & Victoria Gitman - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (7-8):961-984.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
25 (#884,004)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New reals: Can live with them, can live without them.Martin Goldstern & Jakob Kellner - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (2):115-124.
Suslin's hypothesis does not imply stationary antichains.Chaz Schlindwein - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 64 (2):153-167.
Preserving Preservation.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):914 - 945.
Shelah's work on non-semi-proper iterations, II.Chaz Schlindwein - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1865-1883.

View all 8 references / Add more references