Deadly Algorithms

Continent 4 (4) (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has long been argued that robotic systems decrease the error margin of civilian casualties that are often the consequence of human error. The focus on algorithmic decision-making and the gradual reduction of human control unveils moral and juristic issues that lead to the crucial question: can we take algorithms to court?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,283

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Algorithms, Agency, and Respect for Persons.Alan Rubel, Clinton Castro & Adam Pham - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (3):547-572.
Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?Florian Pethig & Julia Kroenung - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 183 (3):637-652.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-08

Downloads
4 (#1,813,178)

6 months
4 (#1,223,411)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan Schuppli
Goldsmiths College, University of London

Citations of this work

Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods.Malte Ziewitz - 2016 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (1):3-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Computing and moral responsibility.Merel Noorman - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references