- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system
In Semir Zeki & Oliver Goodenough (eds.), Law and the Brain. Oxford University Press (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A radical reversal in cortical information flow as the mechanism for human cognitive abilities: The frontal feedback model.R. A. Noack - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (3):281-304.
Ethics in the criminal justice system.Scott Howard Belshaw - 2015 - Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt publishing company. Edited by Peter Johnstone.
There but for the Grace of My Orbitofrontal Cortex …. [REVIEW]Frej Klem Thomsen - 2014 - Criminal Justice Ethics 33 (3):220-235.
Frontal Lobe Plasticity and Behavior.Bryan Kolb & Robbin Gibb - 2002 - In Donald T. Stuss & Robert T. Knight (eds.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford University Press.
Criminal Law is the Problem, Not the Solution.John Griffiths - 2007 - In Charles A. Erin & Suzanne Ost (eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oxford University Press.
The Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law.Charles A. Erin - 2007 - In Charles A. Erin & Suzanne Ost (eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oxford University Press.
Solving the “human problem”: The frontal feedback model.Raymond A. Noack - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):1043-1067.
Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language.Mark Jung-Beeman - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (11):512-518.
Can the Law Do Without Retributivism? Comments on Erin Kelly’s The Limits of Blame.Adina L. Roskies - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):217-222.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-04-03
Downloads
2 (#1,894,204)
6 months
1 (#1,886,937)
2014-04-03
Downloads
2 (#1,894,204)
6 months
1 (#1,886,937)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.Ariane Bigenwald & Valerian Chambon - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform Through Direct Brain Interventions.Nicole A. Vincent - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):21-42.
The ant colony as a test for scientific theories of consciousness.Daniel A. Friedman & Eirik Søvik - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-24.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-g6qm9 uwo