ChatGPT: a transformative role in academia–insights into academic staff performance since adoption

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 23 (1):32-53 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose The escalating integration of AI tools like ChatGPT within academia poses a critical challenge regarding their impact on faculty members’ and researchers’ academic performance levels. This paper aims to delve into academic performance within the context of the ChatGPT era by exploring the influence of several pivotal predictors, such as academic integrity, academic competence, personal best goals and perceived stress, as well as the moderating effect of ChatGPT adoption on academic performance. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a quantitative method to investigate the impact of essential variables on academic integrity, academic competence, perceived stress and personal best goals by analysing 402 responses gathered from ResearchGate and Academia.edu sites. Findings While affirming the established direct positive relationship between academic integrity and performance since adopting AI tools, this research revealed a significant moderating role of ChatGPT adoption on this relationship. Additionally, the authors shed light on the positive relationship between academic competence and performance in the ChatGPT era and the ChatGPT adoption-moderated interaction of competence and performance. Surprisingly, a negative association emerges between personal best goals and academic performance within ChatGPT-assisted environments. Notably, the study underscores a significant relationship between heightened performance through ChatGPT and increased perceived stress among academicians. Practical implications The research advocates formulating clear ethical guidelines, robust support mechanisms and stress-management interventions to maintain academic integrity, enhance competence and prioritise academic professionals’ well-being in navigating the integration of AI tools in modern academia. Originality/value This research stands out for its timeliness and the apparent gaps in current literature. There is notably little research on the use of ChatGPT in academic settings, making this investigation among the first to delve into how faculty and researchers in education use OpenAI.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advantages and Drawbacks of Chatgpt in the Context of Drafting Scholarly Articles.Burhan Fatih Kocyigit & Alikhan Zhaksylyk - 2023 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 4 (3):163-167.
ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?Damian Okaibedi Eke - 2023 - Journal of Responsible Technology 13 (C):100060.
AI in Higher Education.David S. Fowler - 2023 - Journal of Ethics in Higher Education 3:127-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-23

Downloads
1 (#1,944,679)

6 months
1 (#1,886,949)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?Damian Okaibedi Eke - 2023 - Journal of Responsible Technology 13 (C):100060.

Add more references