- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Collective Risks and the Social Disvalue of Research
American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):90-93 (2025)
Abstract
Although it has been widely recognized since the Belmont Report that “risks and benefits of research may affect the individual subjects, the families of the individual subjects, and society at larg...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report.Franklin G. Miller & Jonathan Kimmelman - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):219-219.
Beyond the Belmont Report.Wamia Siddiqui & Richard R. Sharp - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (10):1-4.
Towards Identifying an Upper Limit of Risk: A Persistent Area of Controversy in Research Ethics.Erin T. Paquette & Seema K. Shah - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):327-345.
Rethinking Risks and Benefits in Stakeholder-Engaged Research: Lessons from HIV, Substance Use, and Sexual Health Research with Marginalized Communities.Adrian Guta, Peter A. Newman & Adam Bourne - 2023 - In Emily E. Anderson (ed.), Ethical Issues in Community and Patient Stakeholder–Engaged Health Research. Springer Verlag. pp. 197-217.
Individual risk and community benefit in international research.Robert C. Hughes - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):626-629.
The Social Risks of Science.Jonathan Herington & Scott Tanona - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (6):27-38.
Should protections for research with humans who cannot consent apply to research with nonhuman primates?David Wendler - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):157-173.
Analytics
Added to PP
2025-01-30
Downloads
1 (#1,946,798)
6 months
1 (#1,892,267)
2025-01-30
Downloads
1 (#1,946,798)
6 months
1 (#1,892,267)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?Carolyn Riley Chapman, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Heini M. Natri, Courtney Berrios, Patrick Dwyer, Kellie Owens, Síofra Heraty & Arthur L. Caplan - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):47-60.
Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?Carolyn Riley Chapman, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Heini M. Natri, Courtney Berrios, Patrick Dwyer, Kellie Owens, Síofra Heraty & Arthur L. Caplan - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):47-60.
Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?Carolyn Riley Chapman, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Heini M. Natri, Courtney Berrios, Patrick Dwyer, Kellie Owens, Síofra Heraty & Arthur L. Caplan - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):47-60.
Group risks, risks to groups, and group engagement in genetics research.Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):351-369.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-xlp8h uwo