Individual risk and community benefit in international research

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):626-629 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely agreed that medical researchers who conduct studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are morally required to ensure that their research benefits the broader host community, not only the subjects. The justification for this moral requirement has not been adequately examined. Most attempts to justify this requirement focus on researchers' interaction with the community as a whole, not on their relationship with their subjects. This paper argues that in some cases, research must benefit the broader host community for researchers to treat subjects and prospective subjects ethically. If research presents substantial net risks to subjects, researchers can ethically ask LMIC citizens to participate only if people in LMICs, normally including people in the host community, stand to benefit.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement.Robert C. Hughes - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e29-e29.
The Ethics of Medical Research.David Novak - 2022 - In Tomas Zima & David N. Weisstub, Medical Research Ethics: Challenges in the 21st Century. Springer Verlag. pp. 17-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-06

Downloads
56 (#401,341)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert C. Hughes
Rutgers Business School–Newark and New Brunswick