Attitudes as nonentities

Philosophical Studies 76 (2-3):175-203 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

materialist that beliefs are not immaterial soul-states, I think that the conception of beliefs as brain states is badly misguided. I hope to show that "beliefs are brain states or soul states" is a false dichotomy. I am using the phrase 'beliefs as brain states' to cover several familiar theses: the token-identity thesis, according to which beliefs are identical to brain-state tokens; nonreductive materialism, according to which beliefs are constituted by brain states (as pebbles are constituted by..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#174,462)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

What is this thing called 'commonsense psychology'?Lynne Rudder Baker - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (1):3-19.
First-personal aspects of agency.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):1-16.
Bennett and Hacker on neural materialism.Greg Janzen - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (3):273-286.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references