Science education and moral education

Zygon 23 (3):347-355 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both science and ethics are embedded in cultural traditions where truths are shared through education; both need competent critics educated within such traditions. Education in both ought to be directed although moral education demands levels of responsible agency that science education does not. Evolutionary science often carries an implicit or explicit understanding of who and what humans are, one which may not be coherent with the implicit or explicit human self‐understanding in moral education. The latter in turn may not be coherent with classical human self‐understandings. Moral education may enlighten and elevate the human nature that has evolved biologically.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
42 (#534,616)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reply to criticisms.Martin Eger - 1988 - Zygon 23 (3):363-368.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):324-324.
Abusing Science--The Case against Creationism.Philip Kitcher - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):85-89.
Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism.Michael Ruse - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.
Conditions of knowledge.Israel Scheffler - 1965 - Chicago,: Scott, Foresman.
The Selfish Gene. [REVIEW]Gunther S. Stent & Richard Dawkins - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (6):33.

View all 13 references / Add more references