Rights and responsibilities on the home planet

Zygon 28 (4):425-439 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Earth is the home planet, right for life. But rights, a notable political category, is, unfortunately, a biologically awkward word. Humans, nonetheless, have rights to a natural environment with integrity. Humans have responsibilities to respect values in fauna and flora. Appropriate survival units include species populations and ecosystems. Increasingly the ultimate survival unit isglobal; and humans have a responsibility to the planet Earth. Human political systems are not well suited to protect life atglobal ranges. National boundaries ignore important ecologicalprocesses; national policies do not favor an equitable distribution of sustainable resources. But there are signs of hope.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
164 (#142,799)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ethics in Biodiversity Conservation.Patrik Baard - 2021 - London and New York: Routledge.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
A defence of the deep ecology movement.Arne Naess - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.
A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation.Aldo Leopold - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):618-620.

Add more references