Theory development should begin (but not end) with good empirical fits: A comment on Roberts and Pashler (2000)

&
Psychological Review 109 (3):599-603 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.599

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Postscript: Theory development should not end (but always begins) with good empirical fits: Response to Roberts and Pashler's (2002) reply.Joseph Lee Rodgers & David C. Rowe - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):603-604.
Reply to Rodgers and Rowe (2002).Seth Roberts & Harold Pashler - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):605-607.
The IQ paradox is still resolved: Reply to Loehlin (2002) and Rowe and Rodgers (2002).William T. Dickens & James R. Flynn - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (4):764-771.
Comment on Jamieson, Hangen, Lee, and Yaeager: What Should We Regulate to Promote Adaptive Functioning and How?Maya Tamir - 2017 - Emotion Review 10 (1):65-67.
How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.Seth Roberts & Harold Pashler - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (2):358-367.
Capacity Limitations and the Detection of Correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000).Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):256-267.
Is the handedness gene on the X chromosome? Comment on Jones and Martin (2000).Michael C. Corballis - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):805-809.
Book Review: Recovering Christian Character: The Psychological Wisdom of Søren Kierkegaard by Robert C. Roberts. [REVIEW]Aaron P. Edwards - 2024 - Studies in Christian Ethics 37 (2):429-432.
Sample Size and the Detection of Correlation--A Signal Detection Account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). [REVIEW]Richard B. Anderson, Michael E. Doherty, Neil D. Berg & Jeff C. Friedrich - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):268-279.
Error Biases in Spoken Word Planning and Monitoring by Aphasic and Nonaphasic Speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000).Ardi Roelofs - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (2):561-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
23 (#928,616)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reply to Rodgers and Rowe (2002).Seth Roberts & Harold Pashler - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):605-607.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reply to Rodgers and Rowe (2002).Seth Roberts & Harold Pashler - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):605-607.

Add more references