Comment on “Language and Emotion”: Metaphor, Morality and Contested Concepts

Emotion Review 8 (3):282-283 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nature of emotion concepts and whether there are any that are universally “basic” remains controversial, as acknowledged in the article “Language and Emotion.” The suggestion that some emotions are embodied through a process of association between neural networks for bodily sensations (e.g., raised temperature) and neural circuitry dedicated to linguistic metaphor is interesting, but speculative. However, it is a hypothesis that risks relegating speakers of languages that lack sophisticated metaphors to a lower level on some scale of linguistic evolution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-08

Downloads
40 (#563,866)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”.Dan I. Slobin - 1996 - In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 70--96.
Why we 're so smart'.Dedre Gentner - 2003 - In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. MIT Press. pp. 195--235.
Language and Emotion.George Lakoff - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (3):269-273.
Words and meanings: lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures.Cliff Goddard - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Anna Wierzbicka.

Add more references