A critique of hypertension treatment trials and of their evaluation

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):149-164 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00300.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Evidence‐based medicine, practice variations and clinical freedom.J. R. Hampton - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (2):123-131.
Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care.Regina P. El Dib, Álvaro N. Atallah & Regis B. Andriolo - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):689-692.
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence‐based medicine age. [REVIEW]Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, Regina Stella Spagnuolo, Amélia Kamegasawa, Leandro Gobbo Braz, Adriana Polachini do Valle, Eliane Chaves Jorge, Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo, Antônio José Maria Cataneo, Ione Corrêa, Fernanda Bono Fukushima, Paulo do Nascimento, Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo, Marise Silva Teixeira, Edison Iglesias de Oliveira Vidal, Solange Ramires Daher & Regina El Dib - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):633-637.
Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.Mary Dixon-Woods, Ray Fitzpatrick & Karen Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):125-133.
Evaluation of the agreement between guidelines and initial antihypertensive drug treatment using a national health care reimbursement database.Pierre Meneton, Philippe Ricordeau, Alain Weill, Philippe Tuppin, Solène Samson, Hubert Allemand, Pierre Durieux & Joël Ménard - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):623-629.
The protagonists of 'evidence‐based medicine': arrogant, seductive and controversial.A. Polychronls, A. Miles & P. Bentley - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):9-12.
From the life‐cycles of clinical evidence to the learning curve of clinical experience.Herve Maisonneuve & Tiiu Ojasoo - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (4):417-421.
On the scientific inference from clinical trials.L. Holmberg, M. Baum & H. O. Adami Md - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):157-162.
Prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs by family physicians and general practitioners in the primary care setting in Bahrain.Reginald P. Sequeira, Khalid A. Jassim, Awatif H. H. Damanhori & Vijay S. Mathur - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (4):407-414.
Evidence‐based healthcare, clinical knowledge and the rise of personalised medicine.Andrew Miles, Michael Loughlin & Andreas Polychronis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):621-649.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#869,013)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Dietary salt and hypertension: a scientific issue or a matter of faith?J. Ian S. Robertson - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (1):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references