Can Brain Scans Prove Criminals Unaccountable?

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (2):35-37 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leonard Berlin (2014) reports that neuroscientific data have been presented in court by lawyers wishing to argue that their clients have reduced or absent moral responsibility for their behaviour b...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,589

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-28

Downloads
57 (#387,089)

6 months
10 (#354,391)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rebecca Roache
Royal Holloway University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature.Steven Pinker - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (4):765-767.
Neurobiology, neuroimaging, and free will.Walter Glannon - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):68-82.
Brain Imaging in the Courtroom: The Quest for Legal Relevance.Stephen J. Morse - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (2):24-27.

Add more references