Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Use of Neurointerventions for Criminals

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):152-153 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Birks and Buyx (2018) argue that punishment of criminal offenders using mandatory neurointerventions constitutes a morally objectionable intervention in the mental state of an offender. Birks and B...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2018.1496177

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is Incarceration Better than Neurointervention? On the Intended Harms of Prison.James Edgar Lim - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):168-170.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
The Negative Effects of Neurointerventions: Confusing Constitution and Causation.Thomas Douglas & Hazem Zohny - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):162-164.
Differences in the Interior Design of Prisons and Persons.Christoph Bublitz - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):170-172.
Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders.Andrea C. Palk - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):150-152.
Can Neurointerventions Communicate Censure? (And So What If They Can’t?).David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paternalism as Punishment.David Birks - 2021 - Utilitas 33 (1):35-52.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.
If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible.Andrea Lavazza - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):154-156.
Review of David Birks and Thomas Douglas, eds., Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018, 384 pp. [REVIEW]Jason Hanna - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (1):123-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
26 (#856,815)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references