- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Giving the boot to the bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers
Cognition 101 (3):B51-B60 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
How to Learn the Natural Numbers: Inductive Inference and the Acquisition of Number Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):924-939.
Lance J. Rips.Reasoning Imperialism - 2002 - In Renée Elio, Common sense, reasoning, & rationality. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 215.
Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model Edward E. Smith, Daniel N. Osherson, Lance J. Rips, and.Margaret Keane - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 355.
Asmuth, J., B51.J. Atkinson, E. Balaban, E. Barenholtz, D. Bavelier, R. J. R. Blair, K. Breckenridge, N. Burgess, B. Butterworth, J. Call & J. Collins - 2006 - Cognition 101:545-546.
ADLER, JONATHAN E. Y RIPS, LANCE J. Reasoning. Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, 1057 pp. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro - 2011 - Anuario Filosófico 44 (3):621-624.
Why cardinalities are the “natural” natural numbers.Mathieu Le Corre - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):659-659.
What is still needed? On nativist proposals for acquiring concepts of natural numbers.Wen-Chi Chiang - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):646-647.
From magnitude to natural numbers: A developmental neurocognitive perspective.Roi Cohen Kadosh & Vincent Walsh - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):647-648.
The innate schema of natural numbers does not explain historical, cultural, and developmental differences.Marie-Pascale Noël, Jacques Grégoire, Gaëlle Meert & Xavier Seron - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):664-665.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
47 (#491,890)
6 months
7 (#469,699)
2014-01-20
Downloads
47 (#491,890)
6 months
7 (#469,699)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Mathieu Le Corre & Susan Carey - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):395-438.
Bootstrapping of integer concepts: the stronger deviant-interpretation challenge.Markus Pantsar - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):5791-5814.
Does learning to count involve a semantic induction?Kathryn Davidson, Kortney Eng & David Barner - 2012 - Cognition 123 (1):162-173.
References found in this work
Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group.Pierre Pica, Cathy Lemer, Véronique Izard & Stanislas Dehaene - 2004 - Science 306 (5695):499-503.
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.C. R. Gallistel & Rochel Gelman - 1992 - Cognition 44 (1-2):43-74.
Evidence Against Empiricist Accounts of the Origins of Numerical Knowledge.Karen Wynn - 1992 - Mind and Language 7 (4):315-332.
Six does not just mean a lot: preschoolers see number words as specific.B. Sarnecka - 2004 - Cognition 92 (3):329-352.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-qtxsx uwo