How to Avoid Being Driven to Consequentialism: A Comment on Norcross

Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):50-58 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Norcross Right about Right?Shelly Kagan - 2025 - Utilitas 37 (1):44-56.
Speed Limits, Human Lives, and Convenience: A Reply to Ridge.Alastair Norcross - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):59-64.
Consequentialism and Cluelessness.James Lenman - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4):342-370.
Consequentialism and the Problem of Collective Harm: A Reply to Kagan.Julia Nefsky - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (4):364-395.
Right and Wrong: Assessing Scalar Consequentialism.Brian McElwee - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (5):707-724.
The rights and wrongs of consequentialism.Brian McElwee - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (3):393 - 412.
The rejection of scalar consequentialism.Rob Lawlor - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (1):100-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#225,928)

6 months
6 (#622,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Ridge
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Limited Aggregation and Risk.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 46 (2):117-159.
Taurek, numbers and probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
Why Not Road Ethics?Meshi Ori - 2020 - Theoria 86 (3):389-412.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (2):135-167.

Add more references