The Teleological and Deontological Structures of Action: Aristotle and/or Kant?

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 21:99-111 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is usually assumed in moral philosophy that a teleological approach, as exemplified by Aristotle's ethics of virtue, and a deontological approach, as heralded by Kant's ethics of duty, are incompatible; either the good or the right, to designate these two major traditions by their emblematic predicates. My purpose in this paper is to show that a theory of action, broadly understood, may provide the appropriate framework of thought within which justice can be done to both the Aristotelian and Kantian, the teleological and deontological moments of morality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
132 (#166,963)

6 months
14 (#229,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Phronesis, poetics, and moral creativity.John Wall - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):317-341.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references