Does Heath Have a Good Answer to Steinberg?

Business Ethics Journal Review 7 (3):14-20 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Etye Steinberg has recently raised a problem for Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach. In this paper we consider a response by Heath. We argue that Heath’s response not only leaves the original problem intact, but also raises a second one, analogous to stakeholder theory’s so-called “identification problem.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconciling Traditional Morality and the Morality of Competition.Adam D. Bailey - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (2):207-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-26

Downloads
50 (#457,975)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Repp
Longwood University

Citations of this work

Market Failures and Moral Failures: A Dilemma.Olof Leffler - 2024 - Public Affairs Quarterly 38 (2):153-171.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation.R. Edward Freeman - 2001 - Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie 3:144.
The General Theory of Second Best.R. G. Lipsey & Kelvin Lancaster - 1956 - Review of Economic Studies 24 (1):11-32.

Add more references