Intimacy of Management: Codified Construction of Personalised Selves

Philosophy of Management 6 (2):47-60 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Individualisation’ is a well-known societal phenomenon of late modernity. At the organisational level it shows up in different managerial forms and HRM technologies that focus more and more intensively on the employee as an individual person. In order to assess an employee’s personal contribution and commitment emphasis is put on the characteristics of individuals: their talents, performance and personality. Reporting on research on an individualised pay system in Denmark, this paper illustrates the empirical complexity of this personalisation process. It shows how the employee is created and ‘codified’ as an individual person. It occurs in three different ways according to the codes of learning, love and the moral. It indicates that the postulated regime of individualisation follows a variety of trajectories to reach its target making for a quite subtle way of intimately managing human relations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The influence of personal and organisational characteristics on employee engagement and performance.Archana Shukla & Swati Dhir - 2018 - International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 11 (2):117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
59 (#363,400)

6 months
21 (#141,632)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
The Differentiation of Society.Niklas Luhmann - 1983 - Studies in Soviet Thought 25 (1):31-36.
Contesting the political: Butler and Foucault on power and resistance.Catherine Mills - 2003 - Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3):253–272.

Add more references