What Facts Should be Treated as ‘Fixed’ in Public Justification?

Social Epistemology 33 (6):491-502 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn his account of public reason Rawls assumes that some facts ought to be treated as ‘fixed’, or beyond reasonable disagreement. These include, for him, facts upon which there is a scientif...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public Reason Can Be Reasonably Rejected.Franz Mang - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):343-367.
Why the Facts Matter to Public Justification.Philip Shadd - 2015 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 27 (2):198-212.
Public Reason Naturalism.James Dominic Rooney - 2024 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 68 (3):195-210.
Truth and Uncertainty in Political Justification.Fabienne Peter - 2021 - In Elizabeth Edenberg & Michael Hannon (eds.), Political Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 64 - 75.
III—Normative Facts and Reasons.Fabienne Peter - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (1):53-75.
The Weight of Reasons.Daniel Fogal & Olle Risberg - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (9):2573-2596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-17

Downloads
71 (#297,267)

6 months
10 (#420,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile