The syllogism revised

Philosophy of Science 19 (1):1-16 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The syllogism has often been criticized. Yet the theory of the syllogism cannot be omitted from logic. Even if it were not for its historical significance, its nature as a chapter of class logic assigns to it a place in any presentation of logic.The usual exposition of the theory of the syllogism, however, whether given by the use of the familiar rules of the syllogism, or by the help of diagrams, appears clumsy and lacks the lucidity of modern chapters of logic. The reason seems to be given in the inefficient notation, taken over from ancient and medieval logic. In the following I should like to present an improved notation, which combines some of the traditional features with modern ones, and which is based on the criticism of the syllogistic theory which I have given elsewhere. It will be seen that in the revised form the theory of the syllogism is apt to meet the standards of modern logic.

Other Versions

reprint Reichenbach, Hans (1960) "The Syllogism Revised". Journal of Symbolic Logic 25(1):80-81

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#223,882)

6 months
15 (#206,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Problem Did Ladd-Franklin (Think She) Solve(d)?Sara L. Uckelman - 2021 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 62 (3):527-552.
Varieties of Cubes of Opposition.Claudio E. A. Pizzi - 2024 - Logica Universalis 18 (1):157-183.
Oppositions and opposites.Fabien Schang - 2012 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 147--173.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references