Sinister innovations: Beware the co-optation of clinical ethics consultation [Book Review]

Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):235-242 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,583

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What kind of doing is clinical ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Receiving Clinical Ethics Consultation Services.Jana M. Craig & Thomas May - 2024 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 14 (1):1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#588,301)

6 months
4 (#1,005,389)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lisa Marie Rasmussen
University of North Carolina, Charlotte

References found in this work

Evaluating the Outcomes of Ethics Consultation.J. M. Craig & Thomas May - 2006 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 17 (2):168-180.
Collapsing goods in medicine and the value of innovation.Thomas Magnell - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):155-168.

Add more references