Modern legal theory and judicial impartiality

Portland, Or.: GlassHouse Press (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This new book argues that at the core of legal philosophy’s principal debates there is essentially one issue judicial impartiality. Keeping this issue to the forefront,Raban’s approach sheds much light on many difficult and seemingly perplexing jurisprudential debates. Modern Legal Theory and Judicial Impartiality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Grammar of Bias: Judicial Impartiality in European Legal Systems.Vito Breda - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (2):245-260.
Impartiality in Judicial Ethics: A Jurisprudential Analysis.W. Wendel - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 22 (2):305-324.
Judicial lawmaking and judicial reform: Theoretical and practical aspects of the relationship.Yurii Kryvytskyi - 2024 - Философия И Гуманитарные Науки В Информационном Обществе 14 (3):43-54.
On The Sufficiency of Legal Arguments.Li Zhao & Ming Yuan - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 2:118-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#521,775)

6 months
1 (#1,599,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references