Limited indeterminism

Review of Metaphysics 16 (1):55-61 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The general question to which Edwards here addresses himself is "whether any event whatsoever, and volition in particular, can come to pass without a cause of its existence," and among other arguments for a negative answer he has a reductio ad absurdum, arguing that if an act of will can occur without a cause, then anything at all, no matter how fantastic, can occur without a cause. There is, he says in effect, an inner contradiction in the notion that uncaused events are bound always to be acts of will. We must note, however, in following his argument through, that his language is not quite that which I have just used, and in particular he does not speak primarily of what "occurs" but rather of what "begins to be." He says

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards a Theory of Limited Indeterminism in Branching Space-times.Thomas Müller - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):395-423.
Comments on Prior's Paper.J. B. Schneewind - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (2):374 - 379.
Professor Prior and Jonathan Edwards.Mary Mothersill - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (2):366 - 373.
Negative Liberty.Michael Levin - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):84.
A Kind of Necessary Truth.Norman J. Brown - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (191):37 - 54.
Is the universe self-caused?Robert J. Deltete - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):599-603.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#399,298)

6 months
12 (#290,681)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?