Why we argue about the law : an agonistic acount of legal disagreement

In Pawel Banas, Adam Dyrda & Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki (eds.), Metaphilosophy of Law. Portland, Oregon: Hart (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaphilosophy of Law.Pawel Banas, Adam Dyrda & Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki (eds.) - 2016 - Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Theoretical Disagreement and the Semantic Sting.Dale Smith - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (4):635-661.
The epistemology of theoretical disagreement.Adam Dyrda - 2016 - In Pawel Banas, Adam Dyrda & Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki (eds.), Metaphilosophy of Law. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Kierkegaardian Ethics and the Rule of Law.Joshua Neoh - 2024 - Law and Critique 35 (2):357-375.
Legal Positivism for Legal Officials.Felipe Jiménez - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 36 (2):359-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references