Distinguishing two features of accountability for AI technologies

Nature Machine Intelligence 4:734–736 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Policymakers and researchers consistently call for greater human accountability for AI technologies. We should be clear about two distinct features of accountability.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Accountability in AI Ethics and Governance.Theodore Lechterman - 2023 - In Justin B. Bullock, Yu-Che Chen, Johannes Himmelreich, Valerie M. Hudson, Anton Korinek, Matthew M. Young & Baobao Zhang (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press.
Legal Accountability in AI-Enhanced Healthcare : A Socio-Legal Perspective.Soufiane Ouariach & Anjali Raghav - 2025 - In Bhupindara Siṅgha, Christian Kaunert, Balamurugan Balusamy & Rajesh Kumar Dhanaraj (eds.), Computational intelligence in healthcare law: AI for ethical governance and regulatory challenges. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall, CRC Press.
AI, Ethics, and Patient Autonomy : A Framework for Accountability in Healthcare.Shayut Pavapanunkul & Manmeet Kaur Arora - 2025 - In Bhupindara Siṅgha, Christian Kaunert, Balamurugan Balusamy & Rajesh Kumar Dhanaraj (eds.), Computational intelligence in healthcare law: AI for ethical governance and regulatory challenges. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall, CRC Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-23

Downloads
90 (#233,552)

6 months
11 (#347,933)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Annette Zimmermann
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references