Consciousness, adaptation and epiphenomenalism

In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Consciousness Evolving. John Benjamins (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consciousness and evolution are complex phenomena. It is sometimes thought that if adaptation explanations for some varieties of consciousness, say, conscious visual perception, can be had, then we may be reassured that at least those kinds of consciousness are not epiphenomena. But what if other varieties of consciousness, for example, dreams, are not adaptations? We sort out the connections among evolution, adaptation, and epiphenomenalism in order to show that the consequences for the nature and causal efficacy of consciousness are not as dire as has sometimes been supposed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
130 (#168,675)

6 months
105 (#57,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Polger
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

Is Consciousness a Spandrel?Zack Robinson, Corey J. Maley & Gualtiero Piccinini - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2):365--383.
Neuropragmatism on the origins of conscious minding.Tibor Solymosi - 2012 - In Liz Swan (ed.), Origins of Mind. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 273--287.
The mind of the noble ape in three simulations.Tom Barbalet - 2012 - In Liz Swan (ed.), Origins of Mind. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 383--397.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references