If You’re Not First, You’re Last: Are the Empirical Premises Correct in the Ethics of Anti-Doping?

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (4):495-506 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the ethical discussion of anti-doping, a number of normative arguments rely on empirical premises. The truth of these premises, however, often remains unverified. This article identifies several...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideology, Doping and the Spirit of Sport.Vincent Geeraets - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (3):255-271.
Moral and ethical decision-making: A chance for doping prevention in sports?Marcus Melzer, Anne-Marie Elbe & Ralf Brand - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):69-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-15

Downloads
48 (#460,195)

6 months
11 (#352,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Doping and Cheating.Jan Vorstenbosch - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):166-181.
How to justify a ban on doping?Christof Breitsameter - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):287-292.

Add more references