- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reasoning: A Practical Guide for Canadian Students
Scarborough, Ont. : Prentice-Hall Canada (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Pinto and J. Anthony Blair, Reasoning: A Practical Guide.D. Hitchcock - 1996 - Argumentation 10:306-310.
David Hitchcock : On Reasoning and Argument: Essays in Informal Logic and Critical Thinking: Cham , Springer, pp, xxvi, 1–553. Foreword by J. Anthony Blair.Christopher W. Tindale - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):615-620.
J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. [REVIEW]Jan Albert Laar - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson (eds): Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning: College Publications, London, 2011. [REVIEW]Jan Albert van Laar - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):337-344.
Attacking faulty reasoning: a practical guide to fallacy-free arguments.T. Edward Damer - 2008 - Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Laerning.
Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning.Fabio Paglieri - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (3):438-461.
J. Anthony Blair: Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Introduction by Christopher W. Tindale: Argumentation Library, Vol. 21. Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, XXII + 358 p. [REVIEW]Christian Plantin - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (3):379-388.
The Inference to the Best Means.Stephen L. Darwall - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):49 - 58.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-13
Downloads
12 (#1,368,341)
6 months
1 (#1,886,937)
2015-02-13
Downloads
12 (#1,368,341)
6 months
1 (#1,886,937)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants.Robert C. Pinto - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):287-317.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-q5wnn uwo