Philosophia peripatetica emendata. Leibniz and Des Bosses on the Aristotelian Corporeal Substance

Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (3):421-440 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A few months before his death, Leibniz wrote to Des Bosses, My doctrine of composite substance seems to be the very doctrine of the Peripatetic school, except that their doctrine does not recognize monads. But I add them, with no detriment to the doctrine itself. You will hardly find another difference, even if you are bent on doing so.1 It is tempting to take Leibniz’s profession of Aristotelian orthodoxy as circumstantial: the entire correspondence he had with the Jesuit Father Bartholomew Des Bosses is based on a project of reconciliation between his “system” and the dogmas of the Catholic Church, mediated by Aristotelian philosophy.2 But even so, this circumstantial...

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-10

Downloads
740 (#34,088)

6 months
81 (#75,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lucian Petrescu
Princeton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

" " (Quotation Marks).Marjorie Garber - 1999 - Critical Inquiry 25 (4):653-679.
.Christia Mercer (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Why corporeal substances keep popping up in Leibniz's later philosophy.Glenn A. Hartz - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):193 – 207.
XXI. Leibniz und das Vinculum substantiale.E. Rösler - 1914 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 27 (4):449-456.
Leibniz et les machines de la nature.Michel Fichant - 2003 - Studia Leibnitiana 35 (1):1 - 28.

View all 7 references / Add more references