Leibniz and the Substance of the Vinculum Substantiale

Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):203-220 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes Leibniz's notorious 'vinculum substantiale', or 'substantial bond', as it appears in his correspondence with the Jesuit philosopher and theologian, Bartholomew Des Bosses. It is shown that, while Leibniz employs the vinculum to address a problem relating to the unity of corporeal substance, it ultimately violates other key principles in his philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
837 (#27,937)

6 months
16 (#190,197)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brandon Look
University of Kentucky

Citations of this work

Why did Leibniz fail to complete his dynamics?Stephen Howard - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):22-40.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references